I am not sure if this is an amazing insight or a statement of the bleedin’ obvious. But their statistics look very impressive.
Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart argue in a paper presented this afternoon that trust in the media and government is a negative indicator of democracy. In other words, Chinese people express a lot of faith in their media and government, despite (or rather because) of the limits of media and other freedoms.
They go further and assert that with growing economic wealth and development people become more sceptical (or Skeptical as they say here in Boston) and that actually leads to greater self-expression which (with the help of free media) leads to greater democracy.
So the country with low faith in media and government (Sweden, Germany) has high ratings for democracy.
It’s more complicated than that of course (everything in Harvard is) but the World Bank’s Sina Odugbemi points out one danger. If you say that democracy follows growth (with the help of free media etc) than the danger is that rulers in poor countries can tell their people to prioritise economic growth above democracy. I think I have got that right, but what does it mean for the role of journalism? See for yourself via Pippa’s website. Also check out Ronald’s World Values Survey website.
I think I have got that right, but what does it mean for the role of journalism? See for yourself via Pippa’s . Also check out Ronald’s website.
Or put another way: “It appears that for the heaviest consumers of the news (the more educated, the better-off, older respondents), we have clear evidence that familiarity with the news product breeds a lack of confidence (if not contempt) with the media as an institution.”
The Dimensions of Institutional Trust: How Distinct is Public Confidence in the Media? Timothy E. Cook, Paul Gronke (April, 2001)